so have thought about this a bit. Even started doing the experiment myself but got derailed somehow ... nope can't remember what derailed me.
My intent was to compare loading and shooting paper cartridges in comparison to loading and shooting metal cartridges.
Letz take the 1861 navy 36 for the cap n ball revolver paper cartridges.
Letz take the 1872 open top in 38 special for the metal cartridges.
Now to even the playing field ... no special restrictions on "rolling and loading paper cartridges.
Further letz restrict the 38 special loading to Lymans complete model 311 nut cruncher for the metal cartridges.
Timed event may look something like this;
Cleaning the metal cases
Sizing the 38's
Flairing the 38's
Priming the 38's
Powdering the 38's
Seating and crimping the bullets in the 38's
Loading the 38's in the 72 revolver
Ejecting the fired cases
Reload
The paper cartridges something like this;
Roll the paper cartridges
Powder the paper cartridges
Seat the bullet or ball in the paper cartridges
Dunk the bullet in melted lube
Load the paper cartridges in the 61 navy
Cap the nipples
Reload
Let us further stipulate that we load 50 of each. Shoot 50 of each and load 6 per loading of the revolvers.
I am betting that overall time spent on each style ... paper versus metal ... cartridges ... that the paper cartridges take less time to mess with.
I further would bet that loading lose powder, balls, lube OVER the chamber and capping takes less overall time then either.
Any takers on the experiment?
Be cool if we got three or four experimenters to offset a person that has a pat method.
What say yee ... been a little still round these parts lately.