Banner image by Mike116

Banner image by Mike116

Author Topic: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions  (Read 3602 times)

Offline Steamburn

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #15 on: June 01, 2023, 01:49:29 PM »
Today is Thursday and yes, I went to the range to test my new 1858 Navy brasser.
Using a two hand hold, at 10 yrds, I got a 3 inch grouping, 3 inches to the right and 6 inches low.  Now to file gradually and carefully the front sight until it hits bulls eye.  For windage I'll have to tap the front sight to the right a miniscule amount.

I used about 36 cartridges I had made, with 15 gr of FFF.  Because the frame is the same as the .44 Army, the ram, that was originally a .44 ram, is reduced at the tip to .33" for only .42", and using only 15 gr of BP plus a wax/crisco, the travel of the ram is marginal on pushing the ball all the way down.  Later on, I loaded 18 gr and that gave enough fill in the chambers to counter the limitation of the ram.

Am I happy with it?  yes and no.  Because it is a .44 Army frame, the Navy weighs (2lbs 13oz), more than my .44 Army (2lbs 11 oz).  That's a bummer.  I think I'll have to get the Colt 1851 Navy, that I presume weighs less (If somebody may provide the answer, I would appreciate it).

On the positive side, it is a precise shooter.  I just have to make it accurate too.

It is a keeper.

Now comes the task of washing it :(

By the way, I pushed in a ball into one of the chambers, and then pushed it out an gave me a diameter of .3670".  (I'll have to get a set of internal diameter gauges for the future).


Offline Captainkirk

  • Administrator Extraordinaire and Part-Time Gunslinger
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8777
  • "Never said I didn't know how to use it" M.Quigley
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #16 on: June 01, 2023, 06:30:23 PM »
You can always use 2F powder to keep the pressures a bit lower. Not sure if that would alter accuracy?
"You gonna pull those pistols, or whistle Dixie?"

Offline Hawg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5761
  • Now you went and done it!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #17 on: June 01, 2023, 06:40:28 PM »
You can always use 2F powder to keep the pressures a bit lower. Not sure if that would alter accuracy?

I don't see any difference
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and tasteth good with ketchup.

Offline G Dog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1427
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #18 on: June 03, 2023, 03:31:54 PM »
Why do guys even buy contra-historic brass guns, especially those forty-fours?  I don’t get it.
"Tolerance is the last virtue of a dying society."
                                                   --   Aristotle

Offline Hawg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5761
  • Now you went and done it!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #19 on: June 03, 2023, 04:43:22 PM »
Why do guys even buy contra-historic brass guns, especially those forty-fours?  I don’t get it.

Some don't care but most I think don't know any better.
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and tasteth good with ketchup.

Offline Captainkirk

  • Administrator Extraordinaire and Part-Time Gunslinger
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8777
  • "Never said I didn't know how to use it" M.Quigley
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #20 on: June 03, 2023, 07:24:23 PM »
Why do guys even buy contra-historic brass guns, especially those forty-fours?  I don’t get it.

Some buy them for the cost savings, some because they like the way they look. Some for both reasons, probably. To each his own.
"You gonna pull those pistols, or whistle Dixie?"

Offline AntiqueSledMan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
  • Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #21 on: June 04, 2023, 03:15:45 AM »
Hello Steamburn,

You could add a filler, that way you would be able to seat your ball a little more consistently.
I've been using Biodegradable Packaging Peanuts in my .45 Colt Cartridges, but they probably won't work in a paper cartridge.
Maybe some dried coffee grounds, or Cream of Wheat.

Just a thought, AntiqueSledMan.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2023, 03:21:47 AM by AntiqueSledMan »

Offline Captainkirk

  • Administrator Extraordinaire and Part-Time Gunslinger
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8777
  • "Never said I didn't know how to use it" M.Quigley
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #22 on: June 04, 2023, 08:31:15 PM »
Hello Steamburn,

You could add a filler, that way you would be able to seat your ball a little more consistently.
I've been using Biodegradable Packaging Peanuts in my .45 Colt Cartridges, but they probably won't work in a paper cartridge.
Maybe some dried coffee grounds, or Cream of Wheat.

Just a thought, AntiqueSledMan.

Cream of Wheat has been the old standby for eons.
"You gonna pull those pistols, or whistle Dixie?"

Offline Clydesdale4x4

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 375
  • Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #23 on: June 04, 2023, 09:30:41 PM »
Why do guys even buy contra-historic brass guns, especially those forty-fours?  I don’t get it.


Mine was given to me. I like the ring of 40+ grains, a brasser is not for me, and I will regift this soon.

Offline Steamburn

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #24 on: June 06, 2023, 04:56:34 PM »
Navy6,
" .....but using pin gauges....."
I had no idea what ping gauges are, so I researched and learned something new.  They are amazing but too much tool for my needs.
The set of pin gauges from .25" to .50" costs about $125.  An alternative I found is to use Small Hole Ball Gauges.  Got a set for $14.00 in Amazon.  I think that will be more then enough for my present and future needs.  (I do have a regular vernier gauge and also a 0-1" caliper gauge to complement the ball gauges).

Offline Steamburn

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #25 on: June 06, 2023, 05:01:08 PM »
Why do guys even buy contra-historic brass guns, especially those forty-fours?  I don’t get it.
GDog,
I agree with you, but my intention is to shoot the heck out of it to see if the brassers are as bad as they say.
This is a .36 cal, so I think I might be for a very long run until it starts failing.

Offline Steamburn

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #26 on: June 06, 2023, 05:06:19 PM »
Hello Steamburn,

You could add a filler, that way you would be able to seat your ball a little more consistently.
I've been using Biodegradable Packaging Peanuts in my .45 Colt Cartridges, but they probably won't work in a paper cartridge.
Maybe some dried coffee grounds, or Cream of Wheat.

And to AntiqueSledMan,
I keep my wax/crisco cockies in Cream of Wheat so they don't stick to each other.
Next time I will add a small amount of Cream of Wheat to my loads, maybe a 5 gr volume equivalent over the BP and see how it goes.
Thank you for the tip.

Offline G Dog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1427
    • View Profile
Re: Old vs. new brass frame reproductions
« Reply #27 on: June 11, 2023, 08:39:15 PM »
Steam - your projected testing of that .36 brass frame should dispel some myths or confirm a very hard truth. Turning your piece into a lab mouse / crash test dummy could be risky to  the guns well-being. If you’re game we’re all about it. Likely to produce some interesting results though.  Good luck and keep us in the loop.

When I use filler CoW (George) is the go-to.  Has a similar grain as powder.  Won’t compress much so get it right the first time. Corn meal is too oily.  Packing peanuts are not a part of my life.  Plastic?
"Tolerance is the last virtue of a dying society."
                                                   --   Aristotle