Are these "historically" correct? Since we are being so adamant about the caliber and the bore size . . . . why not the bullet itself? If that's gonna be thrown out, I see no point in the whole thing. This is why I don't let "historically correct" drive me. You end up compromising at some point some stage anyway (usually). Center fire, rim fire, powder, barrel twist.
Heck, I'm happy with my non-correct, fast twist, modern steel, .45C shooting, gated conversion, extremely accurate, Uberti copy of Whitneyville and 1st Mod. Dragoons!! They deliver just as great a shooting experience today that the originals did for their owners that went down this "conversion" road.
Of course, I don't have the time or will or the first gen. arm (or the money for a first gen. Dragoon that I would do this to or one already converted!!). That's just me though.
I'm reading though, it's interesting enough .
Mike
www.goonsgunworks.comFollow me on Instagram @ goonsgunworks