Banner image by Mike116

Banner image by Mike116

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - brownie

Pages: [1] 2
1
Navy Models / Re: Loading lever catch, New Uberti 1861 Navy Civilian
« on: September 02, 2022, 04:14:00 PM »
Good suggestion, I once lost the main spring keeper from a Ruger Single Six because I failed to use the plastic bag idea. After looking in everywhere in the basement without luck, I just made a new keeper!  Thanks for the suggestion StrawHat.
Brownie

2
Navy Models / Re: Loading lever catch, New Uberti 1861 Navy Civilian
« on: August 12, 2022, 02:49:26 PM »
 I'll put a few more rounds through it this summer before I make any changes of any kind, just to get more familiar with it.
Thanks for the input.

Brownie

3
Navy Models / Loading lever catch, New Uberti 1861 Navy Civilian
« on: August 10, 2022, 11:34:05 AM »
One more thing I forgot mention during my "review" of the subject gun, the loading lever catch has a spring that seems to be about five times heavier than it ought to be. Comparing its resistance factor to my two other 2nd Gen. Colts, and my Uberti '58 Remington, it takes far more pressure to retract the catch to release the loading lever.

Therefore my question is; has anybody ever encountered this issue, and created a fix for it? 
I can envision driving out the pin and snipping a coil or two off of the spring or maybe just get a hardware store replacement.
I can see were this operation would require great care so as not to allow the catch to go flying into some obscure corner of your shop never to be found.
Thanks,
Brownie

4
Navy Models / Re: New Pietta 1851 Navy
« on: August 10, 2022, 09:21:40 AM »
Oldman,...Question for you.
In your post # 38,  you said " This thing was not releasing the bolt until the hammer actually hit the nipple".
By that statement, did you mean that the that the hammer cam was not releasing the bolt to timely engage a cylinder notch as you pulled the hammer to
the full cock position??
Thanks,
Brownie

5
Navy Models / Re: Tale of the new Uberti 1861 Navy civilian
« on: August 08, 2022, 06:15:05 PM »
Thanks for all of your comments.
Yes, I'm thinking about sending it off to Goon's this fall.
If I do, I will provide a comparative analysis.   
Brownie

6
Navy Models / Tale of the new Uberti 1861 Navy civilian
« on: August 06, 2022, 06:53:06 AM »
Greetings all,       

  As you all know, replica Colts from Italy have been hard to come by in recent years. I had been interested in a Uberti 1861 Navy for sometime. Last June Taylor’s website suddenly changed from “out of stock” to “in stock” for the 1861, and so time to place my order.

   On arrival, and after cleaning of enough preservative oil to top off the lawnmower, I was quite
pleased with the parts fit and finish as well as the lock work.  Timing seems right on and the bolt locks up the cylinder nice and tight at full cock. The only “fly in the bullet lube” was that the wedge would bottom out against its retaining screw. It was not a really sloppy fit, it’s just that I could move it with my thumb alone.  So back to Taylor’s it went.

   Their fix was to peen the front of the arbor slot in an attempt to upset the metal and narrow the slot. It sorta worked, but after 50 or so rounds its not really as tight as it should be. Taylor’s gets an “A” for effort and quick turn around time,….  and some knucklehead at Uberti gets an “F” Minus for not rejecting it during their Q.C. process.

  Anyway, I replaced the original nipples with a set of S.S. ones from Track of The Wolf and tested it with Hornady .375 R.B.’s , over 15 grains of FFFG and Cream of Wheat filler topped with a little Crisco.

  With nine cylinders of R.B.s through it, I was quite surprised and pleased with the accuracy.
It is more accurate than my two Second Gen. Colts and maybe even a bit better than my Uberti Remington.
So far the wedge has not changed position during shooting, and the barrel is not loose on the arbor. I hope to cure the wedge issue with proper lengthening of the arbor, or maybe just send the thing to Mr. Goon.

  The really interesting thing about shooting the gun was that it was shooting dead on the mark at my 20 yard range right out of the box with NO sight tinkering. The 1861 Navy has a blade style sight as opposed to the 1851’s “golden pimple”. Perhaps that is the difference ???

So,…I wonder if anyone else who might own a Uberti 1861 Navy finds that it shoots very close to the mark without sight adjustment ?

I also wonder what sight modifications other 1861 Navy owners have found beneficial to accurate shooting ? Does everyone enlarge the hammer notch a bit?

Thanks for any thoughts, suggestions or comments on the 1861 Navy that may be offered.

Brownie

7
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Alec Baldwin shooting charges ?
« on: March 23, 2022, 10:01:51 AM »
Correct Captain. And the unfortunate thing is that current public views on firearms, I.M.O.,.... have been intentionally shaped in a negative manner by the press, and media. Just one facet of the cultural decline of this country.
Baldwin has always impressed me as a cocky, smart aleck, in your-face-type of personality. I suspect his true personality contributed to an indifferent, negligent, and careless attitude when it comes to safety.
Further, I think this type of attitude is becoming more prevalent in our society, and likely contributes to a broad spectrum of mishaps, and accidents.
It will be interesting to see this play out.

8
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Alec Baldwin shooting charges ?
« on: March 23, 2022, 08:35:23 AM »
I just noted in the news that the bridge tender in West Palm Beach Florida has been arrested in the case of the elderly women who fell from the bridge as it was being raised last February. She was charged with "manslaughter by culpable negligence".
With that event in mind, hard to believe at least Baldwin and the armorer won't be charged.

Brownie

9
Off-Topic Discussion / Alec Baldwin shooting charges ?
« on: March 22, 2022, 08:22:28 PM »
  Just read the older thread re: the Alec Baldwin shooting last October. I wonder if Miguel Loco's final comment regarding a trial that found an actor guilty for an accidental shooting just might help to set a precedent for charges in the Baldwin shooting,... New Mexico criminal laws notwithstanding. I would think those charges ought to be forthcoming pretty soon from the D.A. However, it's no doubt that she has (had) a lot of finger pointing to sort out.

  Seems to me that Baldwin will (and should) get charged for some form of negligent homicide as well as that so-called armorer girl. The analysis of the gun's functionality will be very interesting as well. Frankly, it won't bother me if they're preparing a cell in the county prison with Baldwin's name on it.

  Further, the generally uninformed, misinformed, (intentionally and otherwise) press and media often characterized the gun as an "antique Colt pistol". Hard to imagine this pack of fools was really using a genuine "antique" Colt single action,  and not an Italian made replica. 
Anybody here know for sure what the gun was that "went off all by itself",.... (I.E.,...in Baldwin's hand without pulling the trigger) ????

Thanks, Brownie

10
Flintlock Muskets and Rifles / Re: Show us your flintlocks
« on: March 19, 2022, 06:51:51 PM »
Thanks for the complements. I read some of the comments about flintlocks, and perceived ignition lag . The Jim Chambers lock is an excellent lock that is very fast with ignition. Once I touch the front trigger, as soon as I hear /sense the flint strike the frizzen the round ball is on it's way. Seems like the key to flintlocks is a quality lock, correct orientation to the flash hole, and of course a good sharp flint. It produces between one and two inch (bench rest) groups at fifty yards.
 
Flintlocks take a lot of experimenting with load components. For example, common recommendation is the tightest ball / patch combination you can hammer down the bore. Not always. I started with a .015 linen patch and .360 R/Balls. Took a while to figure out, but this rifle seems to shoot best with a .358 R/B and .010 patch with just a "dash" of spit. Saturating a patch with lube, of whatever type, may not always be conducive to allowing the ball a good grip on the rifling with the patch in all cases.

In 21 years of shooting this rifle, I've never had a problem with the lock. The frizzen still makes lots pf sparks. This rifle has a straight barrel. I have another rifle ready to be started with a "swamped" barrel, (tapered and flared). They are much lighter for off hand shooting. That rifle will also wear a Chambers lock.    I made the bag and the horn.
Here's another photo,...forgive me, I'm still getting hang of correctly resizing them ! 

11
Flintlock Muskets and Rifles / Re: Show us your flintlocks
« on: March 18, 2022, 06:15:30 PM »
My Flintlock, .36 caliber Green Mountain barrel, Chamber's Golden Age Lock. I picked out the wood from a blank and had it band sawed, rough carved and the barrel channel cut. I did everything else. Lancaster design.   

12
General Discussion / Re: Polish Cappers
« on: March 18, 2022, 05:04:51 PM »
Do these cappers work with Remingtons ?
thanks

13
General Discussion / Tools of the Trade...
« on: March 16, 2022, 06:20:42 PM »
Assuming I got the photo load correctly, here are a few tools that I have found useful. Since I've never done any poking around forums before, not sure if they are redundant.

The two brushes are small hog bristle toll brushes commonly found at any art/ hobby store. I've shortened and rounded the bristles a little. They are superb for cleaning the back wall of each chamber where the nipple pokes through. Much better than a jag with a cotton patch on it.

Further note the wire with the curious end. It works well for pulling caps off of nipples, or fishing fragments of caps out of where they shouldn't be.
At first I used my pocket knife, but soon realized that I was being a danger to the finish of my guns, as well as myself. The wire is about .075, and fairly soft steel with a flattened end turned 90 degrees. I then used a small needle file to file a radius approximating the curve of the nipple.

So there's a couple of my tricks, if anyone can use them, or,...... if you can improve on them let us know.
Brownie

14
Photo Gallery / Re: Waterfowl day
« on: March 16, 2022, 05:33:14 PM »
Very nice photos, and that Northern Shoveler pair have quite a bow wave, too !

15
General Discussion / Re: Liquidate collection?
« on: March 16, 2022, 05:25:30 PM »
Good evening Richard,

   Regarding your inventory you wish to liquidate,...you have listed several Uberti 1862 Navy models, I'm not familiar with the 1862,...or possibly did you mean 1861 ?

Thanks,
 Brownie

Pages: [1] 2