One Remmie and three Colt's/clone's. I would say yes because our world is geared to bigger, badder, stronger. The Remington pattern meet's those qualification's for alot of folk's. Stronger appearing frame, though under BP pressure's both design's are more than adequate. Easier to remove or change cylinder's with the Remmie, no tool's needed. Remmie doesn't cap jam.
My first was a 1851 Navy, I learned how to clear cap jam's, how to take it apart if I didn't catch myself dribbling powder out of, instead into the cylinder, and ended up with a ball stuck in the forcing cone, jamming the whole work's up, (try that with a remmie!).
All the nuances aside, I like the Colt's, learning the problem's and how to overcome them, once experienced, all other's seem to be easier. I think for the beginner the Remmie has more of an appeal, for the experienced, I think the Colt get's "the mark".
The historical length belong's to the Colt's and once mastered one can truly think of himself as a pistoleer.
I'd be hard pressed to pick a favorite, any given day could well provide a different answer. I like my Ruger's and Glock, and Marlin, but I'd be quite content with having history stop with the C&B era. I will likely alway's own more Colt's pattern's, and I'll be quite happy with that. Regard's