Another gem from "Gem" Broker. CVA "1861" Colt Navy. I can understand that it might be a typo, but if someone posts this offering with 10 pics, I would think that the seller would have proofread it before posting it. Correctly advertised as a kit gun as it has no visible proof marks or date code. It appears to have a stamping between the hammer screw and the trigger screw, which I presume to be a CVA stamp but I cannot read it. If it had a smooth cylinder, it could be offered as a Schneider and Glassick.
$200 minimum bid for a used brasser with muzzle blue wear, which looks more like improper care as opposed to holster wear? I don't care if the previous owner was a Marine Corps vet. I am a USAF Viet Nam (1971-1974) vet, and that should have nothing to do with an ACW repro pistol sale. Sorry to vent.
There are a lot of new folks on GB and they don't have the expertise and knowledge of old-timers when it comes to BP pistols, and I think of myself as a mid-range old-timer guy. I just wish these newbs would go here first, but they probably don't know about us.
I am retired and have decided to root out faux sellers, intentional or not, who falsely advertise their wares. I "ask the seller a question" and it is more of a chastisement of their offering than a question. Very seldom do I receive a reply, but I received one yesterday from a seller who hought I was out to bust his b**ls. One of these days I might get banned from GB if I receive many complaints, but I'll take it as it comes.
G Dog, Suzuki Bruce, and I seem to be of the same mind. If you other guys have a problem with my mindset, feel free to expound.
Jim
http://www.gunbroker.com/item/689634461