Banner image by Mike116

Banner image by Mike116

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Don

Pages: [1] 2
1
Army Models / Re: .454 or .457
« on: October 13, 2017, 02:50:30 PM »
I've used both but find the .457 to be a bit more accurate out of my Pietta revolvers. A bit more baring surface engaging the rifling may be why they are more accurate.

Don

2
Projectiles / Re: modifies Lee bullets.
« on: October 04, 2017, 05:58:58 PM »
I took an old kitchen knife and put the edge of the blade in the bottom grease groove and rolled the bullet back and forth until I cut through. With soft lead this didn't take long at all. Not a precision process but it works.

Don

3
Projectiles / Re: modifies Lee bullets.
« on: October 01, 2017, 05:11:27 AM »
After cutting off the bottom band of the 130 grain bullets average weight is 92 grains. That is only 8 grains more than the round balls. This small increase in weight doesn't concern me in terms of damage to the frame. I carefully inspect the brass frame after shooting and have not seen any damage. When I've shot the 130 grain bullets I reduce the powder charge to 15 grains and no damage was noted afterward. The 220 grain bullets when modified weigh 160 grains on average. I have fired these through a Remington brasser with a reduced powder charge with no evidence of cylinder imprint or stretch to frame.

Don

4
Projectiles / modifies Lee bullets.
« on: September 30, 2017, 01:41:34 PM »
I have cast 130 grain .36 cal., 220 grain .44 cal. and 200 grain .44 cal. bullets. Recently I got into shooting my brass frame revolvers and wondered how lighter conicals would perform. So I cut off the bottom band on these bullets and tried them. Except for the 200 grain bullets they shot great with excellent accuracy even better than round balls. The 200 grain bullets shot well but the others were much more accurate. Have any of you guys tried this and did you have similar results?

Don

5
Spiller & Burr / sight regulation
« on: September 30, 2017, 01:33:51 PM »
I have a Pietta Spiller and Burr but wow it shoots high, 6 or 8 inches high. What have you other S&B owners done to lower point of impact. I typically shoot at ranges around 10 yards.

Don

6
General Discussion / Re: LGS...really?
« on: November 17, 2016, 11:59:45 AM »
Ignorance and gouging if you ask me. I've been seeing stupid prices on bp guns for a few years now. Lucky for me a local shop has an owner that doesn't like to deal with BP guns so I can get them from him cheap when he has them.

Don

7
General Discussion / Re: 2f or RS in brassers
« on: November 15, 2016, 01:51:07 PM »
I was not offended by any ones reply I asked for opinions and I got them. One thing I did not mention was that the RS was much more accurate. I will continue to experiment with the RS and see if lighter loads can still produce useful energy levels. I think any projectile traveling faster than 600 feet per second or producing energies in excess of 100 foot pounds is quite potent.

Don

8
General Discussion / Re: 2f or RS in brassers
« on: November 14, 2016, 03:52:19 PM »
I do have steel framed revolvers and load them hotter without worries. I am the kind that likes to experiment, with in reason, to see what can be done. Thanks all for your replies.

Don

9
General Discussion / Re: 2f or RS in brassers
« on: November 14, 2016, 02:35:54 PM »
I was hesitant at first to load that much but after I chronographed those loads and saw that velocities where similar or a tad slower than the reduced loads of 3f and P loads I was less apprehensive. When loading a .44 brasser with 3f or P I use 25 grains and no more. Much less and the revolver isn't much use for anything other than punching paper. With the 25 grain load of P I have had no adverse effects on my revolver after many rounds. If the performance of the larger load of RS matches the smaller load of P then the pressures and stresses must be likewise similar at least logically. After I shoot my brassers I look carefully at the recoil shield and the tightness of the cylinder pin. Thus far no problems noted. I may be pushing it but it seems silly to me to have any firearm that doesn't have any defensive potential.

Don

10
General Discussion / 2f or RS in brassers
« on: November 14, 2016, 12:28:09 PM »
Been messing around with my brass framed revolvers lately and decided to try shooting them loaded with 2f or Pyrodex RS instead of reduced loads of 3f or Pyro P. I figured this would reduce some of the pressures and strain on the brass frames while giving me a chance to use up my larger grained powders. I loaded 30 grains in my .44's and 25 in my .36's. These gave me the power equivalents of the reduced 3f and P loads with still no signs of wear and tear on the frames. Pyrodex seems to give better velocities while the black is more consistent shot to shot. Have you fellas done the same and what's your impressions of this way of utilizing 2f in brassers?

Don

11
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Things don't look to good for Will.
« on: August 29, 2014, 01:49:12 PM »
Never liked the guy seemed like a real jerk to me. If the charges are proven I hope he rots in prison.

Don

12
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Smoked pork shoulder today
« on: July 24, 2014, 03:59:06 PM »
Looks yummy! :P :P )l_

13
Single shots / Re: My Kentucky pistol
« on: March 19, 2014, 03:13:43 PM »
I own a number of CVA single shot pistols and all are fine shooters. They tend to prefer heavier loads of powder for best accuracy. I love woods loafing while carrying a brace of my Kentucky or Colonial pistols. Slow to reload but they pack a wollop.

Don

14
Projectiles / Re: Lee 200gr conicals-hand cast
« on: February 07, 2014, 06:07:39 PM »
I have the 200 grain .44 mold and the 130 grain .36 mold. The .44's load easier than the .36's but both are very accurate out of my guns. Casting your own bullets is a fun and useful piece of the BP shooting hobby.

Don

15
Navy Models / Re: Is the Colt Navy possibly the coolest gun ever made?
« on: January 31, 2014, 02:18:55 PM »
The Colt Navy revolver is by far the best looking handgun ever made. The 1851 is a gem but my new fav is the 1861 my wife bought me last Christmas. Its sleek and sexy and shoots a stout load of Swiss powder with accuracy. The Navy Colt will forever be one of my favorite handguns.

Don

Pages: [1] 2